Education

ASPPH engages with members and partners to advance high-quality teaching and learning, support members’ professional development, and sustain a vibrant community of lifelong learning across all areas of the academic public health mission.

FRAMING THE FUTURE


The FTF 2030 initiative convened three expert panels, each responsible for a specific report focusing on key areas for transforming education for public health by 2030. 

Scholarship of Teaching and Learning


ASPPH is dedicated to the principle and practice of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL).   As drawn from Mary Taylor Huber, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (2013), SoTL is an inquiry-driven approach that views classrooms and all other learning spaces as sites for inquiry, innovation, and knowledge building. SoTL practitioners look carefully and critically at their students’ learning, and use the results to:

  • Innovate and improve their teaching
  • Document experiences to build the evidence base
  • Publish to contribute to discipline-based education research and learning sciences.

From 2020-2022, four ASPPH Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) Task Force working groups drove the creation of science-based products to advance important scholarly activity in member schools and programs.  ASPPH continues to guide members on evidence-based methods to research, practice, document, and publish on teaching and learning. 

Image of Instructor Teaching

Comprehensive study and report on the methods, tools, and practices in student course and teacher evaluations, along with recommendations and areas for future research and faculty development.

Instructor Speaking with Microphone

A call to action for evidence-based teaching and takeaways was published. This group published a call to action for evidence-based teaching and takeaways. This group published a call to

Educational Meeting

A data report on the consumption and production of scholarly teaching and learning, concluding with recommendations for six sets of key public health actors to lead in the change, was produced.

Instructor Speaking with Microphone

An original conceptual framework was published that offered critical considerations for implementing theory-informed steps to advance SoTL in academic public health along with key takeaways.

The Importance of Accreditation for Schools and Programs of Public Health

ASPPH members are accredited by the Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH) or accepted into CEPH’s accreditation pipeline. Accreditation is crucial for assuring excellence and it affords funding opportunities and other benefits for students and academic public health leaders.

Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC)


Integrating Academic Public Health with Partner Professions for Collaborative Practice.

As a founding member, in 2009, of the lnterprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) and board leader, ASPPH partners with 22 national health professions associations that promote and encourage constituent efforts to advance interprofessional learning, which prepares future health professionals for improved population health outcomes.

IPEC hosts annual faculty development institutes, poster fairs, and bi-annual membership meetings.

ASPPH members were leaders in the working group that developed IPEC’s revised 2023 Core Competencies here

Competencies and Learning Outcomes


Undergraduate

Colleges and universities seeking to introduce public health content in two- and four-year undergraduate degree programs, regardless of students’ majors, now have a model for integrating knowledge and skills into curricula and co-curricular opportunities to enable students to become more “educated” active participants in their own and their community’s health.

Additionally, the Critical Component Elements report supplied the foundation for what became CEPH’s baccalaureate program criteria. 

Undergraduate Learning Outcomes Model (Educated Citizen)

Critical Component Elements Report

Image of Students in Lecture Hall

Masters

The graduate with a master’s-level education in public health from a CEPH-accredited institution is expected to demonstrate a firm grasp of core content as well as, in most cases, expertise in his or her area of specialization. The following resources, developed by ASPPH, are provided as possible benchmarks to consult in creating new programs or improving existing master’s-level curricula in CEPH-accredited institutions.

Master’s Preparedness and Response Model

Master’s Global Health Model

Image of Professor In Lecture Hall

Are you an ASPPH Member?


A place for ASPPH to promote engagement with our member institutions by connecting individuals who advance our collective mission.
Log in to explore exclusive members-only content and your institution’s participation.